The boys fall in an unmanned, tropical, coral island whose description by Golding is very detailed. The shore where boys stay and sleep is described to have a lot of palm trees making shadow on the ground and behind those trees is dark jungle and space formed by scar. The shore is white because of the coral reef and surf while the sea is dark blue. There are a high platform of pink granite soil and coarse grass on top of it. One of the other significant places would be the top of the mountain. When the three boys arrive at the top they discover a circular hollow filled with overflowing blue flowers. The flowers are strewn over all places on the top of the mountain.The island is described as a very beautiful and peaceful place like the setting of The Coral Island, a classic boys’romantic adventure story whose plot is exactly opposite to Lord of the Flies. While reading the first few chapters of Lord of the Flies, it is likely that a reader expects a happy ending. However, it is shocking that murder takes place in such a peaceful island forming a sharp contrast between the setting and the conflict.
Enormous natural power cleans up vicious things human have done, restoring the peaceful and beautiful setting. The crashed plane has been dragged out by the storm. The dead bodies of Simon and Piggy also have been removed by waves into sea. Humans destroy and nature cleans up, and this sequence continues, even at this moment. Would this alternating sequence lasts forever?

Compared with other dystopian novels I have read, Lord of the Flies is not excessively gloomy. Most of time, I felt rather relaxed, while reading the novel. Unlike to our usual expectation after a plane crash, majority of the boys find things to eat by themselves and have fun not being stressed that they are caught in an island. They are rather enjoying living in the island because there aren’t any adults. This attitude of many boys makes the situation doesn’t look serious.
The climax of this novel is when Piggy is killed by Roger in chapter 11. Ralph and Piggy go to Castle Rock to get Piggy’s stolen glasses back. They are stop by Roger and Jack who appeared from the jungle refuses to return the glasses. Piggy lifts the conch and says repeatedly ‘Which is better – to have rules and agree, or to hunt and kill?’ From the action of Piggy who still sticks to the old conch protocol, we can see that he is the kind of person who always respects the order or rule even though no one else would think that the rule is still effective. At that time Roger throws a rock to Piggy that strikes Piggy ‘a glancing blow from chin to knee’. Then the conch breaks and Piggy falls from the cliff and is killed with ‘his head opened and stuff come out and turned red’.
Major protagonists are Ralph, Simon and Piggy while antagonists are Jack and Roger. Ralph is elected as the leader of the children by popular majority vote. He has leadership, and looks believable, dependable and well-mannered. His leadership comes from instinct and not as much as from his deep insight about human nature, and therefore he was not able to keep the children civilized when the antagonist Jack allures them into instinctive animal pleasure. Simon is good-natured and has insight in the true nature of man, although he is a little younger than the other main characters. His flaw is that he wishes to be alone and does not like to talk in front of others. Piggy is smart and wishes everything in universe to be in good order. However, he is a little lazy and his appearance is not attractive so that others make fun of him. Jack was the leader of the choir before the plane crash, but lost the popular vote against Ralph because he looks ‘ugly without silliness’ and intimidates others. Later he wins against Ralph by providing the children with meat in return for submission to him. He represents the savage nature in man. Roger is quiet and dismal. He appears to be resentful to everyone probably because he has an abused childhood. He is much worse than Jack and represents the evil.
It may be argued that many conflicts between individuals, between individual and society, or between nations result from our internal character flaws. One example I can think of is the massacre at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007. The shooter Seung-Hui Cho who was also a student killed thirty two other students and himself. The cause of Cho’s behavior is generally regarded as his mental illness and resentment to other students. However, Cho had never thought his behavior was because of his internal ‘beast’. Instead, he said ‘I die like Jesus Christ, to inspire generations of the weak and defenseless people’ in the video message mailed to NBC News. He must have thought that he ‘Kills the beast! Cuts his throat! Spills his blood’ during his shooting.
The novel, ‘Lord of the flies’ by Golding descries the savagery behaviors of young British children survived from a plane crash in an isolated unmanned island. What Golding is trying to reveal to us in this novel is the faulty but true human nature or characteristic, which could be very cruel and destructive, or lazy, ignorant and incompetent at the best. The major theme of this novel is that our animal-like brutal nature is hidden barely below the ethical or legal restrictions of our society, and that our beast could erupt anytime into violence or wars when the subtle equilibrium of our society is impaired.